Learning Center
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Insider Look: The Legal Battle Over Michigan’s Marijuana Tax

As debates over marijuana policies evolve, Michigan finds itself at the forefront once again. This time, the controversy revolves around a new 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, presently facing constitutional scrutiny. With initial court proceedings underway, this case has piqued national curiosity due to its potential influence on cannabis pricing and implications for voter-supported laws and tax policies nationwide.

No matter where you reside—whether you're an active cannabis user or an individual far removed from Michigan—this case holds significance. It could set precedence on how other states might design, amend, and defend cannabis taxes, potentially foreshadowing future legal contests as the industry continues its rapid expansion.

Here’s a comprehensive breakdown on what stakeholders across America need to know.

Understanding Michigan's Proposal

Within Michigan’s 2025–2026 budget, legislators have sanctioned a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, primarily to fund road repair projects. This levy is uniquely imposed earlier in the supply chain, preceding the arrival of products onto dispensary shelves.

Michigan already collects two separate taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on cannabis retail transactions (validated by voters in 2018)

  • The state’s standard 6% sales tax

Should this new wholesale tax be upheld, it would position Michigan among the states with the most complex and high-tiered cannabis tax structures in America.

Image 2

The Industry's Legal Challenge

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) argues that the tax is unconstitutional. Their challenge is premised on a pivotal argument:

The 2018 law approved by voters concerning marijuana cannot be revised sans a supermajority legislative vote.

With the recreational cannabis initiative—Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA)—becoming law, any legislative revisions necessitate a three-fourths supermajority.

Legislators passed the wholesale levy through a simple majority.

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol, as quoted in Michigan Advance, highlighted the significance, stating, “As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re in court ensuring the protection of Michigan voters’ will.”

Image 1

Industry groups caution that this tax hike could amplify expenses, burden smaller enterprises, and potentially drive consumers towards unregulated sources—a pattern reflected in high-tax territories such as California.

Schedule a Free Consultation
Let's set you up for financial success!
Here

State's Justification

As Michigan officials assert, the tax stands justified because:

  • The wholesale tax is distinct, not an amendment to the voter-endorsed law from 2018

  • The legislature retains its prerogative to introduce taxes addressing budgetary demands

  • Its goal lies in road infrastructure financing, detached from altering cannabis legislation

If the judicial system concurs, the tax may be enacted by January 1, 2026.

Consumer Impact Considered

Even those residing far from Michigan should observe this, as cannabis tax frameworks often tend to set standards across states. Should the tax withstand the challenge:

  • Wholesale prices might surge

  • Retail prices could climb accordingly

  • Consumers may pivot towards less expensive unregulated markets

  • Smaller entities might face financial pressure or consolidation

If struck down, Michigan’s present tax framework—already one of the country's more economical systems—would persist.

National Implications

Although originating in Michigan, the repercussions extend beyond state lines.

1. It examines the boundaries of voter-endorsed legislation

If legislators introduce taxes without supermajority consent, it could redefine how ballot initiatives function nationwide.

2. Possible influence on other states’ cannabis tax models

States wrestling with infrastructure deficits might adopt similar tax strategies, contingent on Michigan's outcome.

3. Sheds light on an ongoing national issue: varied cannabis taxes

States like Oregon and Michigan maintain relatively modest cannabis taxes, fostering competitiveness in legal products. Others, like California, endure the high tax challenges that boost robust illicit trades.

The Michigan lawsuit might serve as a prototype in future state tax conflicts.

What’s the Next Step?

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has entertained the opening rounds of debates and is poised to announce a decision imminently. The case might eventually ascend to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Whatever the verdict, its impacts will be substantial—not only for Michigan's cannabis entrepreneurs but in assessing how states across America confront voter-approved initiatives, evolving industries, and authoritative taxation.

Schedule a Free Consultation
Let's set you up for financial success!
Here
Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .